<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Sky Wavelength Slider</title>
	<atom:link href="http://orbitingfrog.com/blog/2008/03/11/google-sky-wavelength-slider/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://orbitingfrog.com/blog/2008/03/11/google-sky-wavelength-slider/</link>
	<description>Astronomy, Space and Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:51:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carnival of Space 46 :: Riding with Robots</title>
		<link>http://orbitingfrog.com/blog/2008/03/11/google-sky-wavelength-slider/comment-page-1/#comment-13279</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnival of Space 46 :: Riding with Robots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orbitingfrog.com/blog/2008/03/11/google-sky-wavelength-slider/#comment-13279</guid>
		<description>[...] Frog’s Robert Simpson has uploaded a Google Sky Wavelength Slider for us to try [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Frog’s Robert Simpson has uploaded a Google Sky Wavelength Slider for us to try [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://orbitingfrog.com/blog/2008/03/11/google-sky-wavelength-slider/comment-page-1/#comment-10167</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orbitingfrog.com/blog/2008/03/11/google-sky-wavelength-slider/#comment-10167</guid>
		<description>Tailspin,

It is a fascinating idea that could be partially done via software using a RAW digital picture made by a camera that does not have an IR filter over the sensors.

I took a RAW landscape (unfortunately with an IR filter) and manually simulated what you describe after I read your comment.  Granted, it has none of the EM spectrum and none of the IR, but just from a light standpoint it is fascinating.  Now if only the visible, invisible and EM spectrums could be captured by a single sensor!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tailspin,</p>
<p>It is a fascinating idea that could be partially done via software using a RAW digital picture made by a camera that does not have an IR filter over the sensors.</p>
<p>I took a RAW landscape (unfortunately with an IR filter) and manually simulated what you describe after I read your comment.  Granted, it has none of the EM spectrum and none of the IR, but just from a light standpoint it is fascinating.  Now if only the visible, invisible and EM spectrums could be captured by a single sensor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Sky on the Web at Orbiting Frog</title>
		<link>http://orbitingfrog.com/blog/2008/03/11/google-sky-wavelength-slider/comment-page-1/#comment-9977</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Sky on the Web at Orbiting Frog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orbitingfrog.com/blog/2008/03/11/google-sky-wavelength-slider/#comment-9977</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Sky Wavelength Slider [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Sky Wavelength Slider [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tailspin</title>
		<link>http://orbitingfrog.com/blog/2008/03/11/google-sky-wavelength-slider/comment-page-1/#comment-9876</link>
		<dc:creator>Tailspin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orbitingfrog.com/blog/2008/03/11/google-sky-wavelength-slider/#comment-9876</guid>
		<description>Wow what a cool idea! I wonder if software could interpolate and provide a smooth gradient across the spectrum?

I always wanted to create a viewer, for lack of a better term, that would at least simulate what a landscape, say, would look like at different frequencies and bandwidths. That red glow? That&#039;s he cellphone tower. The blue glow, the TV spectrum, yellow broadcast-band radio.

Wish I could help ya with the hack, but that&#039;s outta my league.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow what a cool idea! I wonder if software could interpolate and provide a smooth gradient across the spectrum?</p>
<p>I always wanted to create a viewer, for lack of a better term, that would at least simulate what a landscape, say, would look like at different frequencies and bandwidths. That red glow? That&#8217;s he cellphone tower. The blue glow, the TV spectrum, yellow broadcast-band radio.</p>
<p>Wish I could help ya with the hack, but that&#8217;s outta my league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
