Whilst I have been trapped in the thesiverse, I have been diligently attempting to ignore all my other projects – but they keep moving along. Whilst Avalon sits behind me in a playpen saying “ba ba” to several bears – and offering the dog a squeeky toy – I thought I would try and write a quick update on some of the projects I intend to resume with whatever free time I find myself with after submission.

.Astronomy

Earlier this week, we had a meeting of the .Astronomy team to discuss the third .Astronomy workshop. It was very exciting with lots of possibilities for locations and dates discussed. We also caught up on some of the projects created and advanced at the Leiden meeting.

A big question that came up – and one I am still mulling over – is that of the nature of .Astronomy. What exactly is it, and how do I know it when i see it? I tend to use it as a descriptive term now (e.g. “ah yes, that is very .astronomy”) but I think it is time to figure out why. This question being raised, and serious discussions of sponsors and venues for a 2010/2011 event leave me feeling very proud. .Astronomy has clearly demonstrated that it is worthy of continuation and expansion.

I can’t wait to get back into a more fully-engaged mode with the whole project. I am extremely glad to have the whole team working with me, and letting me focus on my thesis in recent months. Thanks guys and gals!

365 Days of Astronomy

365 (as people seem to call it) is expanding into 2010 and the days are filling up fast. More sponsorships are needed and I fully intend to dive headlong into comment moderation and posting when I finish the thesis. Another thing that I want to do – and any of you could also do this – is create some backup podcast episodes for 365. When scheduled contributors don’t appear or cancel it is useful to have a bank of backup episodes ready to go.

Chromoscope

Exploring the universe in multiple wavelengths is a lot of fun but I’ve had so litle time to offer this project recently, I’m starting to feel very guilty. We’ve recently added Gamma Ray to the site, from Fermi, and I am slowly compiling a massive UV map, using GALEX. Stuart has been chipping away at new Chromoscope features (such as language support, and making Chromoscope embeddable) and there is talk of an iPhone app in the near future.

Everything Else

There are also my Tweprints and OverTwitter projects which both have potential, large-scale alterations to be made. I shan’t go into details here but maybe these are things I could work on at the next .Astronomy meeting. There is also a cool new project that came out of .Astronomy (I’m currently calling it Zombie) which I really want to get my hands dirty with. Like all the others though, it will have to wait.

The Thesiverse is a large and expanding, multi-dimensional reality. Time is quite variable there too. Next week I am relieved of childcare duties to make a final push at finishing the beast, so wish me luck. Hopefully I shall find my way to a singularity and pop out into your realm once more. Oh dear, Avalon is now trying to get the dog into the playpen so I must go. See you on the other side!

I find that reading papers outside of my own academic field is quite compelling and often sparks the imagination. The problem of course is knowing which papers one should read if you’re not inside the system. After a few weeks this website should begin to show the emerging favourites in any field.

It’s also interesting to simply see what gets talked about. As the data piles up, it will be possible to filter the papers into different topics or types. It might, for example, be useful to see what astrophysics papers are most discussed in a given month, or which biology paper has risen fastest through the ranks this week.

The engine behind the site periodically looks for tweets that contain both the word ‘arxiv’ and an arXiv.org paper identifier (such as 0102.3456). You can see a list of recently detected tweets on the site itself. In this way it will pick up anyone mentioning an arXiv URL or someone who tags their tweets #arxiv and includes the paper id – two things that I often see. It also therefore keeps the idea global – you don’t have to tweet in English.

The statistics and top-tens are worked out democratically:

• If a paper is tweeted 4 times then it is ranked 4x higher than a paper that is mentioned only once.
• I place no restrictions on multiple mentions by the same user at present.
• One can mention more than one paper in a single tweet. This will give each paper a single vote.
• Mentioning the same id code more than once in a tweet does nothing.

If it continues to look interesting, I have every intention of adding more detailed trends to the site as time goes by. For now, I just need data – and by that I mean tweets! Start tweeting about your favourite papers now! If you have any thoughts on the kind of data you’d like to se displayed, then let me know in the comments.

I’m a bit confused about what to call this new site. ‘twarxiv’ came to mind, but is entirely inaccessible to outsiders! Anyone have ideas? If you can think of a good name, or have any other suggestions about arXiv on Twitter then please leave a comment here or contact me @orbitingfrog.

How We Got Online

We begin with a quick history lesson. This is merely to help place into context, some of the facts and figures I will be detailing.

1991: arXiv begins.
1993: Mosaic graphical web browser puts people online, at home.
1994: Netscape Navigator is released becomes standard web browser until Microsoft launch Windows 95 with Internet Explorer built in. Browser wars ensue.
1995: NASA ADS begins online.
1998: Google begins, rise of the search engine.
2000: Dotcom bubble bursts, paves way for new generation of technologies including blogging, social networking etc.
2002: Web becomes ubiquitous in Western culture. This date is obviously only approximate.

It’s All About Numbers: ADS

The ADS receives around 3,000,000 readers a month. These are papers actually read, not including hits that result in no followed link.

Over 1,000,000 unique users every month.

Around 30,000 regular users, who access the service more than 10 times a month.

Fig 1 – The way ADS is used. Data taken from January and February 2008. Shows the things people do with articles they find on ADS.

Fig 2 – The way ADS is found. Data taken from January and February 2008. Shows the ways that users find NASA’s ADS.

It’s All About Numbers: arXiv and astro-ph

arXiv receives around 1,000,000 website hits every working day.

More than 900 papers are submitted to astro-ph every month.

Submitting your paper in the final minutes before the 4pm deadline (US Eastern Time) will increase your citation rate.

Living in the United States increases your chances of achieving this effect.

Fig 3 – Shows the way different journals have adopted astro-ph by looking at the percentage of papers from those journals which are also published on astro-ph.

Fig 4 – The characteristic way that a paper gets read. Initially papers are read on astro-ph when they first go up. After they have appeared on ADS, users tend to prefer to read the refereed article there.

Fig 5 – Typical example from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Papers published in 2007, that were also published on astro-ph received 2.4x as many citations as those that were not. This factor is called the astro-ph Impact Factor.

Fig 6 – Variation of the astro-ph Impact Factor over time for four different journals. Note that the trend is for astro-ph to become more influential as time goes by.

Fig 7 – Impact of astro-ph on Citations for Different Journals. These data points are the averages over the past six years.

Why is astro-ph Influential?

Dietrich (2008a) propose three mechanisms for the impact of astro-ph and other online archives.

Open Access – Because the access to articles is unrestricted by any payment mechanism authors are able to read them more easily, and thus they cite them more frequently.

Early Access- Because the article appears sooner it gains both primacy and additional time in press, and is thus cited more.

Self-selection Bias – Authors preferentially tend to promote (in this case by posting to the internet) the most important and, thus, the most citable articles.

You Can Game the System

Papers appearing at the top of the astro-ph listing each day are seen by more people and thus cited more often. The last submission before the 4pm (Eastern US) deadline appears most prominently in the next mailing and will be listed first. Thus, if you time it right, you can try to place your paper near to the top of the list! The result is that some authors tend to promote their most important works and, thus, most citable articles, by placing them at prominent positions. This not a strong effect but it is also not uncommon.

Being based in the USA the submission deadline preferentially puts those authors at the top of the listing whose working hours coincide with the submission deadline. This is also only a slight effect, and according to Dietrich (2008b) it is more than cancelled out by the author placement effect described above.

In Summary

In a few years, use of astro-ph will be almost universal. The astro-ph preprint archive has had a marked affect on the way academic papers are read and cited. Statistics appear to show astro-ph having an increasing impact, probably as more people use the service more often with improved Internet access.

ADS as a global service introduces biases toward submissions at particular times of day. astro-ph does not diminish readership for publications, nor does it significantly increase use of the ADS. Journals which use astro-ph the most do not see a significantly better impact compared with those that use it less. But all journals see an impact.

Submissions purposefully made near the deadline, artificially increase citation counts but cancel out geographical bias toward North America.

References

Dietrich, J. P., 2008a, “The Importance of Being First: Position Dependent Citation Rates on arXiv:astro-ph”, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Volume 120, issue 864, pp.224-228 – [Link]

Dietrich, J. P., 2008b, “Disentangling Visibility and Self-Promotion Bias in the arXiv:astro-ph Positional Citation Effect”, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Volume 120, issue 869, pp.801-804 - [Link]

Henneken, E. et al., 2006, “Effect of E-printing on Citation Rates in Astronomy and Physics”, Journal of Electronic Publishing, vol. 9. - [Link]

Hennken, E. et al., 2008, “Use of Astronomical Literature – A Report on Usage Patterns”, eprint arXiv:0808.0103 - [Link]

Metcalfe, T. S., 2005, “The Rise and Citation Impact of astro-ph in Major Journals”, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, vol. 37, p.555-557 - [Link]