The periodic mention of a ‘supermoon‘ in the news cycle is starting to annoy me. A supermoon is simply not that much bigger than any other Moon! It’s apparently just perceptible but by no means would you call it ‘super’. Annoyingly though, observation of the so-called supermoon is wrapped up in another effect: the Moon Illusion. This means that people enthusiastically report seeing a really big Moon, but don’t realize that they would likely have thought it big on any other Full Moon night too.
So let me put my rant in some context. The term supermoon was coined by astrologer Richard Nolle about 30 years ago. It refers to a Full Moon or New Moon that occurs when the Moon is in the closest part of its orbit around the Earth. The Moon’s orbit is not perfectly circular and there is a closest point in every cycle (perigee) and a most-distant point too (apogee). At perigee the Moon is closer to the Earth by about 50,000 km (30,000 miles), which is enough to make the Moon appear slightly larger in the night sky. In fact it is about 1.1 times larger in it’s angular diameter on the sky. Expert Moon watchers can see a subtle difference but it’s pretty slight and hardly warrants the title of a ‘super’ moon.

This animated GIF shows a Moon going through one entire orbit (apogee-perigee-apogee) and you can see the changing size (you can also see it undergoing libration, which is the wobbling motion). You can a direct size comparison below. In both these cases you’re seeing it close-up – imaging these things hanging in the sky at a distance. The size change is happening in every cycle, but is most prominent when the Full Moon coincides with perigee, as was the case this week.
So what happened over the weekend was that people heard about a supermoon and so went outside to see it. Given that it any observable supermoon is a Full Moon, this means people went out to see it when it was low down in the sky, because Full Moon’s rise late in the evening. Thus they probably experienced the Moon Illusion and reported that indeed the Moon looked very large.
On a final point: the supermoon is also given silly superpowers by some new outlets too. The natural oscillation of the Moon’s distance does indeed affect tides a little, but it does not cause earthquakes, madness or werewolves.
Thanks for a very clear explanation on how all of this works, and doesn’t as well.
Since I discovered the possibility of spotting the changing size of the Moon naked-eye by accident – see http://cosmos4u.blogspot.de/2011/03/if-you-know-your-full-moon-you-will.html and http://cosmos4u.blogspot.de/2012/05/extra-why-you-should-look-at-tonights.html – it can’t be that hard. And telling people who report a larger-than-“usual” full moon, oh, you probably just fell for the moon illusion (which isn’t that common actually), doesn’t exactly help educate the public about this intriguing fact. Namely that you can detect it with your own eyes that the lunar orbit isn’t a circle.
Thank you! This article really needed to be written. Perigee is cool and all, but full moons are usually pretty bad for great photos. A non-full (really, less than half) perigee moon yields the best pictures IMO, so I’m not sure why people are going crazy over it, other than misconceptions (like the earthquakes thing). Crazy.
The libration is amazing on that GIF by they way. That is awesome. 🙂